Tracking Changes
Last updated on 2024-07-11 | Edit this page
Estimated time: 20 minutes
Overview
Questions
- How do I record changes in Git?
- How do I check the status of my version control repository?
- How do I record notes about what changes I made and why?
Objectives
- Check the history of a file
- Use add and commit to record changes
- Create commit messages that are descriptive
Note This lesson has been adapted from Lesson 4 of Version Control with Git
Getting Started
First let’s make sure we’re still in the right directory. You should
be in the planets
directory.
Let’s create a file called mars.txt
that contains some
notes about the Red Planet’s suitability as a base. We’ll use
nano
to edit the file; you can use whatever editor you
like. In particular, this does not have to be the
core.editor
you set globally earlier. But remember, the
bash command to create or edit a new file will depend on the editor you
choose (it might not be nano
). For a refresher on text
editors, check out “Which
Editor?” in The Unix Shell
lesson.
Type the text below into the mars.txt
file:
OUTPUT
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
Let’s first verify that the file was properly created by running the
list command (ls
):
OUTPUT
mars.txt
mars.txt
contains a single line, which we can see by
running:
OUTPUT
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
If we check the status of our project again, Git tells us that it’s noticed the new file:
OUTPUT
On branch main
No commits yet
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
mars.txt
nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
The “untracked files” message means that there’s a file in the
directory that Git isn’t keeping track of. We can tell Git to track a
file using git add
:
and then check that the right thing happened:
OUTPUT
On branch main
No commits yet
Changes to be committed:
(use "git rm --cached <file>..." to unstage)
new file: mars.txt
Git now knows that it’s supposed to keep track of
mars.txt
, but it hasn’t recorded these changes as a commit
yet. To get it to do that, we need to run one more command:
OUTPUT
[main (root-commit) f22b25e] Start notes on Mars as a base
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
create mode 100644 mars.txt
When we run git commit
, Git takes everything we have
told it to save by using git add
and stores a copy
permanently inside the special .git
directory. This
permanent copy is called a commit
(or revision) and its short
identifier is f22b25e
. Your commit may have another
identifier.
We use the -m
flag (for “message”) to record a short,
descriptive, and specific comment that will help us remember later on
what we did and why. If we just run git commit
without the
-m
option, Git will launch nano
(or whatever
other editor we configured as core.editor
) so that we can
write a longer message.
[Good commit messages][commit-messages] start with a brief (<50
characters) statement about the changes made in the commit. Generally,
the message should complete the sentence “If applied, this commit will”
If we run git status
now:
OUTPUT
On branch main
nothing to commit, working tree clean
it tells us everything is up to date. If we want to know what we’ve
done recently, we can ask Git to show us the project’s history using
git log
:
OUTPUT
commit f22b25e3233b4645dabd0d81e651fe074bd8e73b
Author: Vlad Dracula <vlad@tran.sylvan.ia>
Date: Thu Aug 22 09:51:46 2013 -0400
Start notes on Mars as a base
git log
lists all commits made to a repository in
reverse chronological order. The listing for each commit includes the
commit’s full identifier (which starts with the same characters as the
short identifier printed by the git commit
command
earlier), the commit’s author, when it was created, and the log message
Git was given when the commit was created.
Where Are My Changes?
If we run ls
at this point, we will still see just one
file called mars.txt
. That’s because Git saves information
about files’ history in the special .git
directory
mentioned earlier so that our filesystem doesn’t become cluttered (and
so that we can’t accidentally edit or delete an old version).
Now suppose Dracula adds more information to the file. (Again, we’ll
edit with nano
and then cat
the file to show
its contents; you may use a different editor, and don’t need to
cat
.)
OUTPUT
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
When we run git status
now, it tells us that a file it
already knows about has been modified:
OUTPUT
On branch main
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified: mars.txt
no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
The last line is the key phrase: “no changes added to commit”. We
have changed this file, but we haven’t told Git we will want to save
those changes (which we do with git add
) nor have we saved
them (which we do with git commit
). So let’s do that now.
It is good practice to always review our changes before saving them. We
do this using git diff
. This shows us the differences
between the current state of the file and the most recently saved
version:
OUTPUT
diff --git a/mars.txt b/mars.txt
index df0654a..315bf3a 100644
--- a/mars.txt
+++ b/mars.txt
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
+The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
The output is cryptic because it is actually a series of commands for
tools like editors and patch
telling them how to
reconstruct one file given the other. If we break it down into
pieces:
- The first line tells us that Git is producing output similar to the
Unix
diff
command comparing the old and new versions of the file. - The second line tells exactly which versions of the file Git is
comparing;
df0654a
and315bf3a
are unique computer-generated labels for those versions. - The third and fourth lines once again show the name of the file being changed.
- The remaining lines are the most interesting, they show us the
actual differences and the lines on which they occur. In particular, the
+
marker in the first column shows where we added a line.
After reviewing our change, it’s time to commit it:
OUTPUT
On branch main
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified: mars.txt
no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
Whoops: Git won’t commit because we didn’t use git add
first. Let’s fix that:
OUTPUT
[main 34961b1] Add concerns about effects of Mars' moons on Wolfman
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Git insists that we add files to the set we want to commit before actually committing anything. This allows us to commit our changes in stages and capture changes in logical portions rather than only large batches. For example, suppose we’re adding a few citations to relevant research to our thesis. We might want to commit those additions, and the corresponding bibliography entries, but not commit some of our work drafting the conclusion (which we haven’t finished yet).
To allow for this, Git has a special staging area where it keeps track of things that have been added to the current changeset but not yet committed.
Staging Area
If you think of Git as taking snapshots of changes over the life of a
project, git add
specifies what will go in a
snapshot (putting things in the staging area), and
git commit
then actually takes the snapshot, and
makes a permanent record of it (as a commit). If you don’t have anything
staged when you type git commit
, Git will prompt you to use
git commit -a
or git commit --all
, which is
kind of like gathering everyone to take a group photo! However,
it’s almost always better to explicitly add things to the staging area,
because you might commit changes you forgot you made. (Going back to the
group photo simile, you might get an extra with incomplete makeup
walking on the stage for the picture because you used
-a
!).
In the context of creating official statistics, using
--all
or -a
can lead to files being staged and
committed that should not be released (like microdata) or can cause
difficulties for others on the project (like environment files).
Staging things manually or using a pattern is the best practice, otherwise you might find yourself searching for “git undo commit” more than you would like!
Remember to use git status
after you add files to check
what you have staged/added.
Let’s watch as our changes to a file move from our editor to the staging area and into long-term storage. First, we’ll add another line to the file:
OUTPUT
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity
OUTPUT
diff --git a/mars.txt b/mars.txt
index 315bf3a..b36abfd 100644
--- a/mars.txt
+++ b/mars.txt
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
+But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity
So far, so good: we’ve added one line to the end of the file (shown
with a +
in the first column). Now let’s put that change in
the staging area and see what git diff
reports:
There is no output: as far as Git can tell, there’s no difference between what it’s been asked to save permanently and what’s currently in the directory. However, if we do this:
OUTPUT
diff --git a/mars.txt b/mars.txt
index 315bf3a..b36abfd 100644
--- a/mars.txt
+++ b/mars.txt
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
+But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity
it shows us the difference between the last committed change and what’s in the staging area. Let’s save our changes:
OUTPUT
[main 005937f] Discuss concerns about Mars' climate for Mummy
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
check our status:
OUTPUT
On branch main
nothing to commit, working tree clean
and look at the history of what we’ve done so far:
OUTPUT
commit 005937fbe2a98fb83f0ade869025dc2636b4dad5 (HEAD -> main)
Author: Vlad Dracula <vlad@tran.sylvan.ia>
Date: Thu Aug 22 10:14:07 2013 -0400
Discuss concerns about Mars' climate for Mummy
commit 34961b159c27df3b475cfe4415d94a6d1fcd064d
Author: Vlad Dracula <vlad@tran.sylvan.ia>
Date: Thu Aug 22 10:07:21 2013 -0400
Add concerns about effects of Mars' moons on Wolfman
commit f22b25e3233b4645dabd0d81e651fe074bd8e73b
Author: Vlad Dracula <vlad@tran.sylvan.ia>
Date: Thu Aug 22 09:51:46 2013 -0400
Start notes on Mars as a base
Word-based diffing
Sometimes, e.g. in the case of the text documents a line-wise diff is
too coarse. That is where the --color-words
option of
git diff
comes in very useful as it highlights the changed
words using colors.
Paging the Log
When the output of git log
is too long to fit in your
screen, git
uses a program to split it into pages of the
size of your screen. When this “pager” is called, you will notice that
the last line in your screen is a :
, instead of your usual
prompt.
- To get out of the pager, press Q.
- To move to the next page, press Spacebar.
- To search for
some_word
in all pages, press / and typesome_word
. Navigate through matches pressing N.
Limit Log Size
To avoid having git log
cover your entire terminal
screen, you can limit the number of commits that Git lists by using
-N
, where N
is the number of commits that you
want to view. For example, if you only want information from the last
commit you can use:
OUTPUT
commit 005937fbe2a98fb83f0ade869025dc2636b4dad5 (HEAD -> main)
Author: Vlad Dracula <vlad@tran.sylvan.ia>
Date: Thu Aug 22 10:14:07 2013 -0400
Discuss concerns about Mars' climate for Mummy
You can also reduce the quantity of information using the
--oneline
option:
OUTPUT
005937f (HEAD -> main) Discuss concerns about Mars' climate for Mummy
34961b1 Add concerns about effects of Mars' moons on Wolfman
f22b25e Start notes on Mars as a base
You can also combine the --oneline
option with others.
One useful combination adds --graph
to display the commit
history as a text-based graph and to indicate which commits are
associated with the current HEAD
, the current branch
main
, or [other Git references][git-references]:
OUTPUT
* 005937f (HEAD -> main) Discuss concerns about Mars' climate for Mummy
* 34961b1 Add concerns about effects of Mars' moons on Wolfman
* f22b25e Start notes on Mars as a base
Directories
Two important facts you should know about directories in Git.
- Git does not track directories on their own, only files within them. Try it for yourself:
Note, our newly created empty directory spaceships
does
not appear in the list of untracked files even if we explicitly add it
(via git add
) to our repository. This is the
reason why you will sometimes see .gitkeep
files in
otherwise empty directories. Unlike .gitignore
, these files
are not special and their sole purpose is to populate a directory so
that Git adds it to the repository. In fact, you can name such files
anything you like.
- If you create a directory in your Git repository and populate it with files, you can add all files in the directory at once by:
Try it for yourself:
BASH
$ touch spaceships/apollo-11 spaceships/sputnik-1
$ git status
$ git add spaceships
$ git status
Before moving on, we will commit these changes.
To recap, when we want to add changes to our repository, we first
need to add the changed files to the staging area (git add
)
and then commit the staged changes to the repository
(git commit
):
Choosing a Commit Message
Which of the following commit messages would be most appropriate for
the last commit made to mars.txt
?
- “Changes”
- “Added line ‘But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity’ to mars.txt”
- “Discuss effects of Mars’ climate on the Mummy”
Answer 1 is not descriptive enough, and the purpose of the commit is unclear; and answer 2 is redundant to using “git diff” to see what changed in this commit; but answer 3 is good: short, descriptive, and imperative.
Committing Changes to Git
Which command(s) below would save the changes of
myfile.txt
to my local Git repository?
- Would only create a commit if files have already been staged.
- Would try to create a new repository.
- Is correct: first add the file to the staging area, then commit.
- Would try to commit a file “my recent changes” with the message myfile.txt.
Committing Multiple Files
The staging area can hold changes from any number of files that you want to commit as a single snapshot.
- Add some text to
mars.txt
noting your decision to consider Venus as a base - Create a new file
venus.txt
with your initial thoughts about Venus as a base for you and your friends - Add changes from both files to the staging area, and commit those changes.
The output below from cat mars.txt
reflects only content
added during this exercise. Your output may vary.
First we make our changes to the mars.txt
and
venus.txt
files:
OUTPUT
Maybe I should start with a base on Venus.
OUTPUT
Venus is a nice planet and I definitely should consider it as a base.
Now you can add both files to the staging area. We can do that in one line:
Or with multiple commands:
Now the files are ready to commit. You can check that using
git status
. If you are ready to commit use:
OUTPUT
[main cc127c2]
Write plans to start a base on Venus
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 venus.txt
bio
Repository
- Create a new Git repository on your computer called
bio
. - Write a three-line biography for yourself in a file called
me.txt
, commit your changes - Modify one line, add a fourth line
- Display the differences between its updated state and its original state.
If needed, move out of the planets
folder:
Create a new folder called bio
and ‘move’ into it:
Initialise git:
Create your biography file me.txt
using
nano
or another text editor. Once in place, add and commit
it to the repository:
Modify the file as described (modify one line, add a fourth line). To
display the differences between its updated state and its original
state, use git diff
: